Computer habits and digital literacy in geriatric patients: A survey.

Objective: Among hospitalised geriatric patients, only half are computer users. However, many of them refrain from using telehealth solutions. This study aimed to investigate geriatric patients' computer and Internet habits and digital literacy and their associations with stress levels and frequency of Internet use. Methods: Inpatients and outpatients aged 65 years or older, all computer users, were consecutively surveyed. Besides information about computer and Internet habits, computer support, and computer stress, the survey also collected information about digital literacy using the electronic Health Literacy Assessment toolkit. Results: A total of 124 computer users with a mean age of 80.6 ± 7.4 years participated in the study from 1 October to 1 December 2019. Most patients received computer support from their children and grandchildren, whereas 6% did not seek support. They found themselves 'most familiar with using a keyboard' (79%), 59% 'were unfamiliar with the Copy Paste function', and only one-third 'were open to new ways of using computers'. Digital literacy was associated with the frequency of Internet use (P = 0.001), and higher digital literacy was associated with less computer stress (P = 0.01). Conclusions: Geriatric computer users are challenged by their basic computer skills, which may influence their choice of participation in telehealth solutions. If telehealth solutions are to succeed among geriatric patients, individualised computer support based on their basic computer skills and user-friendly computer devices are a prerequisite. For ongoing support, it is also necessary to introduce people close to the patient to telehealth solutions.

Frailty level at discharge predicts mortality in older patients with Clostridioides difficile more accurately than age or disease severity.

PURPOSE: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has a high mortality among older patients. Identification of older patients with CDI in increased mortality risk is important to target treatment and thereby reduce mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate mortality rates and compare frailty levels at discharge, measured by the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), with age and severity of CDI as mortality predictors in patients with CDI diagnosed during hospitalisation. METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study from Central Denmark Region, Denmark, including all patients ≥ 60 years with a positive CD toxin test without prior infection and diagnosed from 1 January to 31 December 2018. Frailty level, estimated from the electronic medical record, was defined as low, moderate, or severe frailty. CDI severity was graded according to international guidelines. Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. RESULTS: We included 457 patients with median age 77 years (interquartile range 69-84) and females (49%). Overall, 90-day mortality was 28%, and this was associated with age (hazard ratio (HR): 2.71 (95% confidence interval 1.64-4.47)), CDI severity (HR 4.58 (3.04-6.88)) and frailty (HR 10.15 (4.06-25.36)). Frailty was a better predictor of 90-day mortality than both age (p < 0.001) and CDI severity (p = 0.04) with a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 77%. CONCLUSION: The 90-day mortality among older patients with CDI in a Danish region is 28%. Frailty measured by record-based MPI at discharge outperforms age and disease severity markers in predicting mortality in older patients with CDI.

Nutritional risk screening in a Danish university hospital is insufficient and may underestimate nutritional risk: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Disease-related-malnutrition predicts poor clinical outcomes in elderly patients, and screening is pivotal for identifying patients at nutritional risk. The present study aimed to investigate nutrition screening rates in electronic patient records and validate the scores given. A secondary aim was to investigate whether the proportion of patients at risk differed between patients where screening was documented and those where no screening was documented. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a Danish university hospital during November 2020. Patients aged 65 years or more admitted to a medical department were included. The Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) tool was used to identify patients at nutritional risk, both in routine clinical care, where data were collected retrospectively, and during a validation process in a random patient sample, where data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: In total, 817 patients were admitted for more than 24 h. Of these, an NRS-2002 score was documented in 294 (36%), among whom 177 (60%) were at nutritional risk. In 146 patients where no score was documented, 88 (60%) were at risk. Validation was possible in 91 patients where a record-based score and a validated score were documented. The specificity of the record-based score was 100%, whereas the sensitivity was 75%, indicating that routine screening underestimated nutritional risk (p < 0.001, proportion difference 19%; 95% confidence interval = 10%-28%). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic documentation does not solve issues about compliance with nutritional risk screening. In patients where screening was not documented, the occurrence of nutritional risk was similar, indicating that omission of screening is not related to the score.

Preoperative dehydration identified by serum calculated osmolarity is associated with severe frailty in patients with hip fracture.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Preoperative dehydration is a well-known predictor of in-hospital complications and poor functional outcomes in older patients with hip fractures. In an orthopedic and geriatric cooperative setting, we aimed to investigate whether preoperative dehydration was associated with frailty, prolonged hospital stays and short-term mortality in older patients with hip fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Danish university hospital. The study population consisted of patients 65+ years surgically treated for hip fracture. Dehydration was defined as serum calculated osmolarity above 295 mmol/L. Outcomes were frailty at discharge measured by the Multidimensional Prognostic Index, hospital stay of 7 days or more and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: In total, 214 patients were consecutively included in the study from March 11, 2018, to August 31, 2020. The mean age was 81.2 (SD: 7.6) and 69% of the patients were women. The prevalence of preoperative dehydration was 40%. It was associated with severe frailty (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-3.90]; p = 0.02) and prolonged hospital stay (OR: 2.28 [95% CI: 1.29-4.04]; p = 0.02). Seven percent died when dehydrated compared to 5% in the non-dehydrated (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of preoperative dehydration is high among older patients with hip fractures and is associated with severe frailty and length of hospital stay. Systematic screening for dehydration on admission is advisable and may contribute to more adequate fluid management in the perioperative phase.

Faecal microbiota transplantation for first or second Clostridioides difficile infection (EarlyFMT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection is an urgent antibiotic-associated health threat with few treatment options. Microbiota restoration with faecal microbiota transplantation is an effective treatment option for patients with multiple recurring episodes of C difficile. We compared the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation compared with placebo after vancomycin for first or second C difficile infection. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (EarlyFMT) at a university hospital in Aarhus, Denmark. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with first or second C difficile infection (defined as ≥3 watery stools [Bristol stool chart score 6-7] per day and a positive C difficile PCR test). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to faecal microbiota transplantation or placebo administered on day 1 and between day 3 and 7, after they had received 125 mg oral vancomycin four times daily for 10 days. Randomisation was done by investigators using a computer-generated randomisation list provided by independent staff. Patients and investigators were masked to the treatment group. The primary endpoint was resolution of C difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) 8 weeks after treatment. We followed up patients for 8 weeks or until recurrence. We planned to enrol 84 patients with a prespecified interim analysis after 42 patients. The primary outcome and safety outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04885946. FINDINGS: Between June 21, 2021, and April 1, 2022, we consecutively screened 86 patients, of whom 42 were randomly assigned to faecal microbiota transplantation (n=21) or placebo (n=21). The trial was stopped after the interim analysis done on April 7, 2022 for ethical reasons because a significantly lower rate of resolution was identified in the placebo group compared with the faecal microbiota transplantation group (Haybittle-Peto boundary limit p<0·001). 19 (90%; 95% CI 70-99) of 21 patients in the faecal microbiota transplantation group and seven (33%, 95% CI 15-57) of 21 patients in the placebo group had resolution of CDAD at week 8 (p=0·0003). The absolute risk reduction was 57% (95% CI 33-81). Overall, 204 adverse events occurred, with one or more adverse events being reported in 20 of 21 patients in the faecal microbiota transplantation group and all 21 patients in the placebo group. Diarrhoea (n=23 in the faecal microbiota transplantation group; n=14 in the placebo group) and abdominal pain (n=14 in the faecal microbiota transplantation group; n=11 in the placebo group) were the most common adverse events. Three serious adverse events possibly related to study treatment occurred (n=1 in the faecal microbiota transplantation group; n=2 in the placebo group), but no deaths or colectomies during the 8-week follow-up. INTERPRETATION: In patients with first or second C difficile infection, first-line faecal microbiota transplantation is highly effective and superior to the standard of care vancomycin alone in achieving sustained resolution from C difficile. FUNDING: Innovation Fund Denmark.

Prevalence of Computer Use among Geriatric In- and Outpatients.

Objective: Despite its many benefits, tele-rehabilitation is not widely used by the older generations. This study aimed to investigate the opportunity to offer tele-rehabilitation in a geriatric population by determining the prevalence of computer use and to examine whether the patients' characteristics affect computer use. Design: Cross-sectional study. Patients: Cognitive well-functioning in- and outpatients aged 65 years or older. Methods: Patients were consecutively included and surveyed. Results: A total of 249 patients participated in the survey. Among them, 124 were computer users. Four of these never went online. Compared to non-users, computer users were younger OR: 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87; 0.94) p = 0.001, less frail OR: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.25;0.55) p = 0.001, had a higher functional capacity OR: 1.02 (95% CI 1.01; 1.03) p = 0.001 and more often had an education at high school level or higher OR: 1.7 (95% CI: 1.41; 2.40). Conclusion: Only half of the geriatric patients are computer users. If tele-rehabilitation is to be adopted by a wider geriatric population challenged by reduced mobility, long transportation times, or frailty, computer training, user friendly devices and computer support should be considered beforehand.

Effects of a new early municipality-based versus a geriatric team-based transitional care intervention on readmission and mortality among frail older patients - a randomised controlled trial.

Purpose Previous studies reported reduced risk of readmission, mortality and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) among geriatric patients receiving an early (<24h), hospital-based geriatric team intervention after discharge. The objective of this study was to compare a novel, early municipality-based, nurse-led and general practitioner (GP)-supported transitional care intervention (TCI) to an established hospital-based TCI among frail, older, geriatric patients. Material and methods A randomised controlled trial was conducted within a single geriatric department and the adjacent municipality. Inclusion criteria: acutely admitted, frail patients 75+ years old. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to the two TCIs. Primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission. Secondary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality and LOS. Stratified analysis according to type of dwelling was made. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and number needed to treat (NNT) were reported. Results 3,103 patients (median age (IQR): 85 (80-90); 57% female) were included. Readmission rates were 22% in the municipality-based intervention (n=332/1,545), and 18% in the hospital-based intervention (n=276/1,558); OR was 1.27, 95% CI (1.06-1.52), p=0.008 and NNT=27. OR for cohabiting patients was 1.47, 95% CI (1.02-2.08); p=0.035. No significant difference was observed in mortality (22% vs. 21%; OR=1.05, 95% CI (0.89-1.25), p=0.577) or LOS (median (IQR): 6 (2-8) vs. 6 (2-8) days, p=0.1787). Conclusions The new municipality-based, nurse-led and GP-supported intervention was inferior to the hospital-based geriatric team intervention in preventing 30-day readmission among frail, geriatric patients. There was no significant difference between the two interventions in regard to 90-day mortality or LOS.

Involving frail older patients in identifying outcome measures for transitional care-a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: During care transitions, the older (75+) patient's agenda can easily be missed. To counteract this, involving patients in shared clinical decision making has proven to be of great value. Likewise, involving patients and other stakeholders as researchers is gaining ground. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research entails many benefits, for example, by bringing further insight from those with lived experiences of being ill. There are various challenges associated with involving some older patients, for example frailty, cognitive impairment and other chronic illnesses. To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few examples of initiatives involving older patients beyond research participation. The feasibility of involving frail older patients during an ongoing care transition from hospital to primary health care remains unknown. To investigate the feasibility of including older frail patients, their relatives and health care professionals (HCPs) as co-researchers, we established a study with increasingly demanding levels of patient involvement to identify relevant outcome measures for future transitional care research. METHODS: The study was a pragmatic, qualitative feasibility study. The involved individuals were frail older patients, their relatives and HCPs. Patients and their relatives were interviewed, while the interviewer made reflective notes. A thematic analysis was made. Relatives and HCPs discussed the themes to identify relevant outcome measures and potentially co-create new patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in future transitional care studies. The feasibility was evaluated according to six involvement steps. The level of involvement was evaluated using the five-levelled Health Canada Public Involvement Continuum (HCPIC). RESULTS: In total, eight patients, five relatives and three HCPs were involved in the study. Patients were involved in discussing care transitions (HCPIC level 3), while some relatives were engaged (HCPIC level 4) in forming PROMs. The partnership level of involvement (HCPIC level 5) was not reached. The thematic analysis and the subsequent theme discussion successfully formed PROMs. The key PROMs were related to care, transparency and the relatives' roles in the transitional care process. CONCLUSIONS: When applying a pragmatic involvement approach, frail older patients can be successfully involved in identifying relevant transitional care outcome measures; however, involving these patients as fellow researchers seems infeasible. To maintain involvement, supportive relatives are essential. Useful experiences for future research involvement of this vulnerable group were reported, arguing that patient participation has the potential to become inherent in future geriatric research.

The purpose of the study was to involve patients in identifying relevant outcome measures for future transitional care research. Involving patients in research is not new. What makes this project special is that it seeks to involve old, frail patients aged 75 plus.The project used open-form interviews that were not constrained in time and were not audio recorded; this was done to obtain confidence from the patients and their relatives. Each patient was interviewed twice: shortly before the patients left the hospital and shortly after discharge. The purpose was to discuss the patient's experiences during the discharge period. The first interview took place in the hospital, whereas the interviewer visited the patients in their residence for the second interview. An expert panel was then formed involving the patients' relatives and the professional health care workers. The expert panel discussed themes based on the data expressed by the patients during the interviews. In addition, an attempt was made to establish long-term cooperation between the patients, their relatives and the researchers. The health condition and vulnerable state of the patients made it difficult to continue their involvement throughout the research process. In fact, only the relatives and professionals were able to take part in the expert panel. Despite these challenges, the outcome of the project was positive. In conclusion, it makes sense to involve frail patients in transitional care research despite the challenges these patients face in their old age. In future research, frail older patients, relatives and other stakeholders can be involved.

A group-based real-time videoconferencing telerehabilitation programme in recently discharged geriatric patients: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: Exercise at home and improvement in the ability to undertake daily tasks are highly valued by older people after hospitalisation. New telerehabilitation (TR) technologies make it possible to supervise and communicate with exercising participants through videoconferencing equipment. This technology has been shown to be both feasible and effective in Danish chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in terms of basic mobility, safety, social interactions and patient perception. This study sought to examine whether it was feasible to carry out TR through home exercises in groups. METHODS: Both medical and hip-fracture home-dwelling patients aged 65 years and older admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) and Department of Geriatrics for acute reasons were asked to participate in the study just before their discharge. The inclusion criteria were normal cognitive function, being dependent on a walking aid and computer users before hospitalisation. RESULTS: At discharge, 333 patients were consecutively screened for participation. Of those, 300 patients were excluded. Thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. They had a mean age of 82.3 years (± 7.8) and 76% were women. Nine patients agreed to participate, but seven withdrew. The most frequent explanation was exhaustion in the continuation of hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: It was not possible to conduct a videoconference TR study in a geriatric population, as many were excluded and those who were eligible withdrew after inclusion. During the COVID-19 pandemic, TR may be an important tool for isolated older persons to hinder functional decline. Aspects such as recruitment procedures and IT solutions designed for older people must be considered.

Mortality and readmission risk can be predicted by the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index: a cohort study of medical inpatients older than 75 years.

PURPOSE: To examine the predictive value of the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) on mortality, readmission and length of hospital stay (LOS) among older medical inpatients. METHODS: A cohort of medical inpatients aged ≥ 75 years was rated using the record-based MPI to assess frailty retrospectively. 90-day and 1-year mortality hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated in a sex- and age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. 30-day readmission relative risk (RR) estimates were calculated in a binary regression model with mortality as a competing risk. Discrimination was expressed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Median LOS was calculated using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: In total, 1190 patients with a median age of 83 years were included. 50% were male. 335 patients (28%) were categorized as non-frail (MPI score 0.0-0.33), 522 (44%) moderately frail (MPI score 0.34-0.66) and 333 (28%) severely frail (MPI score 0.67-1.0). 90-day mortality HR was 7.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-18.6, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 18.5 (95% CI 7.5-46.1, p < 0.001) for the severely frail compared with the non-frail. ROC area was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.80). Similarly, 1-year mortality HR was 3.3 (95% CI 2.2-5.0, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 7.1 (95% CI 4.7-10.6, p < 0.001) for the severely frail. 30-day readmission RR was 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-2.9, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.6, p = 0.001) for the severely frail. LOS was significantly longer with increasing MPI score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The record-based MPI assessed at discharge predicts dose-dependent post-discharge mortality and readmission risk and is associated with LOS in older medical inpatients.

The impact of a tailored follow-up intervention on comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer - a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can identify health problems in older persons. In addition, CGA includes intervention towards the identified problems. With follow up, more problems may be identified and the interventions can be adjusted. We wanted to compare CGA with or without tailored follow-up in a randomised design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 70+ years referred for oncology treatment with four primary tumour sites. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either control group with no follow-up or intervention group with a tailored follow-up by a multidisciplinary team. Primary outcome was adherence to cancer treatment. Secondary outcomes were daily life activities, physical performance and hospitalisation. RESULTS: In total, 363 participants were randomised. After randomisation only 301 were planned to receive specific cancer treatment. Median age was 75 years. Among the 301 participants, 52% of control group vs. 61% of intervention group completed treatment. Risk Rate (RR): 1.16 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.95-1.42), p = .14. The impact varied between the included tumour-sites, p < .01. We found no difference in 90 days physical performance or daily life activities between groups. During the study period, 55% of controls vs. 47% in the intervention group were admitted to hospital, RR: 0.86 (95%CI: 0.69-1.07), p = .19. CONCLUSION: In frail and vulnerable patients with cancer, a tailored follow-up on CGA showed no differences in ability to complete initially planned cancer treatment. The impact varied between the included tumour sites. We did not find any impact of tailored follow-up on daily life activities, physical performance or hospitalisation.

Mobile X-ray outside the hospital: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: For several years mobile X-ray equipment has been routinely used for imaging in patients too unwell within the hospital, when transportation to the radiology department was inadvisable. Now, mobile X-ray examinations are also used outside the hospital. The literature describes that fragile patients may benefit from mobile X-ray, but we need to provide insights into the breadth, depth and gaps in a body of literature. METHODS: The scoping review was performed by searching PubMed, Cinahl, Embase, EconLit and Health Technology Assessment. English-, Danish-, Norwegian-, German-, Italian-, French- and Swedish-language studies, published 1.1.2009-1.5.2020 about mobile X-ray outside the hospital were included. Participants were patients examined using mobile X-ray as the intervention. PRISMA was used when eligible to build up the review. To extract data from the selected articles, we used a structured summary table. RESULTS: We included 12 studies in this scoping review. The results were divided into four topics:1. Target population 2. Population health 3. Experience of care and 4. Cost effectiveness. The main findings are that target population could be larger for instance including hospice patients for palliative care, group dwelling for people with intellectual disabilities, or psychiatric patients, population health may be improved, image quality seems to be good and mobile X-ray may be cost effective. Limitations of language, databases and grey literature may have resulted in studies being missed. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile X-ray may be used outside hospital. There seems to be potential benefits to both patients and health care staff. Based on the published studies it is not possible to draw a final conclusion if mobile X-ray examination is a relevant diagnostic offer and for whom. Further studies are needed to assess the feasibility of use in fragile patients, also regarding staff, relatives and societal consequences and therefore the topic mobile X-ray needs more research.

A reliable and record-based frailty assessment method for older medical inpatients.

PURPOSE: The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) including frailty assessment is considered the gold standard of assessment in geriatric patients. The Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) is a CGA-based bedside assessment tool. Older medical inpatients' medical records comprehensively describe the MPI-featured components. Consequently, MPI-based frailty assessment may be accomplished retrospectively. We found no previous studies concerning record-based MPI. We studied the reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of a record-based MPI. METHODS: The study was designed as a fully crossed, prospective, and cross-sectional study. A total of 50 inpatients aged ≥ 75 years were included from two medical wards. Record-based MPI was assessed by two independent raters in patients who required personal assistance on a daily basis or had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 1. In the same patients, a bedside MPI rating was performed. Inter-rater and inter-method reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated. RESULTS: Evaluating the inter-rater reproducibility; the mean difference was -0.02 points [95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.06 to 0.01, p = 0.20]. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.71. Evaluating inter-method reproducibility; the mean difference was -0.02 (95% CI - 0.04 to 0.01, p = 0.18); ICC = 0.83. Sensitivity was 100% and specificity 80%. The areas under the receiver operating curves (ROC) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.75-1.00) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.52-1.00). CONCLUSION: The record-based MPI rating method has an acceptable inter-rater reliability, good inter-method reliability, and high agreement as compared to the bedside-rated MPI. The diagnostic accuracy seems considerable. The record-based MPI seems useful in retrospective frailty assessment among older medical inpatients.

Frailty is associated with hospital readmission in geriatric patients: a prognostic study.

PURPOSE: Targeting health care interventions requires valid measurements when predicting unplanned hospital readmission. The Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) enables the prediction of mortality and length of stay (LOS) in older hospitalized patients. Our aim was to validate if the MPI as a frailty tool could predict unplanned hospital readmission in geriatric patients. METHODS: This prognostic study was conducted in geriatric wards. The target population was 65 + -year-old patients hospitalized with acute illness. The MPI tool is derived from eight CGA domains by an interdisciplinary team: social aspects, number of drugs, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental-ADL, cognitive status, severity of morbidity, risk of developing pressure sores, and nutritional status. Patients assessed were categorized into three groups: non-frail (MPI-1), moderate frail (MPI-2) or severe frail (MPI-3). Primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission and secondary LOS and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: In total 1467 patients were included from January 1, 2018, to October 1, 2019. Mean age was 84.2 years (± 7.4) and 59% were women. 15.7% were readmitted. Hazard ratio (HR) for readmission in the MPI-2 group (n = 635) was 2.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-5.29 (p = 0.01), and 2.60; 95% CI 1.27-5.33 (p = 0.009) in the MPI-3 group (n = 711) compared to the MPI-1 group (n = 121). MPI was a predictor of LOS and mortality. CONCLUSION: Using the MPI tool to identify the frail and non-frail patients is applicable to predict unplanned hospital readmission in geriatric patients. The MPI is superior to the prognostic value of each single domain. MPI will be of great value to health professionals' decision-making.

Faecal microbiota transplantation as a home therapy to frail older people.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of antibiotics-associated diarrhoea. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective for recurrent CDI and may be provided as a home treatment to frail, older people. METHODS: We present four consecutive patients with recurrent CDI, treated at home using nasojejunal tube-delivered or encapsulated donor faeces. The primary outcome was combined clinical resolution and a negative CD toxin test 8 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: All four patients had severe CDI and all improved clinically following one FMT. Sustained resolution following one FMT was observed in one patient. Two patients had recurrence and received a second FMT using capsules; both achieved resolution. One patient who had recurrence declined from further FMT due to fear of relapse and was established on long-term vancomycin. No adverse events related to FMT were observed. CONCLUSION: Frail older people may benefit from FMT. Home treatment is a viable option and may be considered both for clinical cure and for palliation.

Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study.

BACKGROUND: For frail patients, it may sometimes be preferable to carry out X-ray examinations at the patients' own home. The general state of such patients may worsen due to transport and change of environment when transported for examination at the hospital. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to investigate if mobile X-ray improves healthcare for fragile patients. The primary outcome was the number of hospitalizations. DATA SOURCES: We collected all data using questionnaires and data from the Electronic Patient Record (ER). PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred to a mobile X-ray examination living in nursing homes and homes for the elderly in the Aarhus Municipality (Denmark). INTERVENTION: mobile X-ray examinations compared to those at the hospital. Study appraisal: Data were collected and stored using the computer programme Redcap. Stata was used for statistical calculations. One hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the RCT. We did not find significant differences between mobile X-ray (intervention) and X-ray at the hospital (control) concerning hospitalizations and number of hospital days. Challenges: We met several challenges when carrying out RCT in the planned study population. Doctors often withdraw the referral when they found out that their patient should go to the hospital instead of mobile X-ray. The nursing home staff often considered the patient too frail to allow the test person to ask questions post X-ray. We also met challenges in the randomization method resulting in bias in the first data collection, so we had to adjust the randomization method. CONCLUSIONS: For the fragile patients in the present explorative study, mobile X-ray did not significantly reduce the number of hospitalizations compared to X-ray at the hospital. Yet, mobile X-ray may be a new important diagnostic tool for more precise treatment to the frailest patients for whom transportation to the hospital is too exhausting. We need studies with focus on this aspect. We also recommend future RCT studies in a population for which mobile X-ray has not yet been a possibility.

Do anticoagulants affect outcomes of hip fracture surgery? A cross-sectional analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The management of patients with a hip fracture is affected by the use of oral anticoagulants. A cross-sectional analysis was undertaken to investigate health outcome differences in those anticoagulated compared to those not anticoagulated. METHODS: Patients aged 50 years and over presenting to a large university hospital with hip fractures were identified from the service registry. Patient characteristics and health outcomes between those not anticoagulated were compared with those anticoagulated (warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants, DOAC). RESULTS: 200/2307 (9%) patients were anticoagulated. 84% were on warfarin, and the rest a DOAC. Compared to those anticoagulated, there was a higher prevalence of dementia (25% vs. 18%, p = 0.02) and a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease (54% vs. 78%, p < 0.01), atrial fibrillation (10% vs. 82%, p < 0.01), and polypharmacy (55% vs. 76%, p < 0.01). Renal function was lower in the anticoagulated group. Time to operation for those not anticoagulated and anticoagulated was a median (IQR) of 25 (15) and 27 (18) hours. There was no difference in blood transfusion and hospital mortality. Postoperative complications were similar except a higher rate of renal failure (14% vs. 19%, p = 0.04) and heart failure (1% vs. 5%, p < 0.01), and a longer length of stay [median (IQR): 14 (10) vs. 16 (12) days] in the anticoagulated group. This was no longer significant after adjustment of confounders. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in health outcomes between those anticoagulated and those not after adjusting for patient characteristics. It was feasible to avoid significant delay in hip fracture surgery in those anticoagulated.

Single-bed rooms in a geriatric ward prevent delirium in older patients.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated treatment environment risk factors for delirium in geriatric patients. In March 2017, a geriatric department was moved from old hospital buildings with multiple-bed rooms (old wards) to a new hospital with single-bed rooms (new wards), with no changes regarding uptake area, staff and admission criteria. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of delirium among patients in single-bed rooms compared with multiple-bed rooms. METHODS: An observational prospective study included patients aged ≥ 75 years admitted between 15 September 2016 and 19 March 2017 to the old wards and between 20 March and 19 December 2017 to the new wards. Exclusion criteria were terminal illness, somnolence at admission and inability to communicate in Danish. Delirium was assessed by trained nurses, nurse assistants, occupational therapists and physiotherapists every morning and evening using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). RESULTS: We included 1014 patients. Patients' characteristics were similar between patients admitted to the old wards and to the new wards. Delirium was present at admission in 105 patients, with no significant difference between the old and new wards. Patients in the new wards had a significantly reduced incidence of delirium during hospital stay compared with patients in the old wards; hazard ratio 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.93, p < 0.02). No difference between the old and the new wards was observed in the duration of the first delirium episode. CONCLUSION: We found evidence that the risk of delirium is reduced in single-bed rooms compared with multiple-bed rooms in geriatric wards.